Simone v. Zakiul Alam, 2025 Pa. LEXIS 393 (Pa. Supreme Ct., March 20, 2025)
JUSTICE MUNDY
We granted allowance of appeal to consider whether an individual who was a tenant in common of real property—but who was not in possession or control of the property—is an indispensable party in a premises liability action against another tenant in common who exercised possession and control over the property at the time of the plaintiff’s injury. Because we conclude that a tenant in common who did not exercise possession or control over the property is not an indispensable party in a premises liability action, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand for further proceedings.
