Skip to main content

RIGHT TO KNOW LAW-INSURANCE DEPARTMENT-PRESUMPTION OF TRANSPARENCY-DELIBERATION OF A PARTICULAR DECISION

Anand v. Commonwealth, 2024 LEXIS 254 (Pa. Commw., October 11, 2024) (McCollough, J.)

In this case the Commonwealth Court points out that on right to know claims there is a presumption of transparency and to construe narrowly the statutory exemptions from disclosure. This involved materials from the insurance department. The question is whether the document is a public document. To withhold a record, an agency must establish 1) the contents of the record are internal to the agency; 2) the contents of the record are deliberated; 3) the deliberations reflected are predecisional. An agency must establish specific facts that the record requested relay to the deliberation of a particular decision. Even construing exemption narrowly, a department may establish that the records requested relayed to a company’s failure to comply with insurance regulatory standards concerning searching inquiries of non-criminal matters conducted by the department, pursuant to its official, legislatively granted investigative powers. An agency can rely on affidavits.