Cauley v. Clinic, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211892 (November 22, 2022) (Brann, J.) Currently pending before the Court is Geisinger Clinic’s (“Geisinger”) motion for the entry of a confidentiality and protective order. This case arises from Keith Cauley, M.D., Ph.D.’s allegations that, while he was employed as a radiologist for Geisinger, he was suddenly placed on administrative leave after Geisinger stated that a peer review revealed poor performance on Cauley’s part. While on leave, Cauley retained an attorney who negotiated Cauley’s resignation from Geisinger. This litigation followed and, after the Court granted in part a motion to dismiss Cauley’s second amended complaint—leaving claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel—the parties began the process of discovery. Geisinger now seeks a confidentiality and protective order related to the peer review investigative information that Cauley seeks. Geisinger argues that a confidentiality and protective order is necessary after a balancing of the relevant factors, as disclosure of the peer review investigations would (1) jeopardize patient identifying information; (2) undermine Geisinger’s privacy interest; and (3) jeopardize public health and safety because the public disclosure of such information would undermine the honest and open dialogue necessary for peer reviews. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has set forth seven non-exhaustive factors that district courts should consider: 1) whether disclosure will violate any privacy interests; 2) whether the information is being sought for a legitimate purpose or an improper purpose; 3) whether disclosure of the information will cause a party embarrassment; 4) whether confidentiality is being sought over information important to public health and safety; 5) whether the sharing of information among litigants will promote fairness and efficiency; 6) whether a party benefitting from the order of confidentiality is a public entity or official; and 7) whether the case involves issues important to the public. Here, the relevant factors weigh in favor of granting Geisinger’s motion.
DISCOVERY-CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
December 8th, 2022 by Rieders Travis in Medical Malpractice