Mertz v. Nippenose Valley Village, Inc., Pa. No. CV-21-00178 (C.P. Lycoming November 21, 2022). The court finds the complaint sufficient to support claim for punitive damages. The complaint alleges The Court finds that Plaintiff’s Complaint contains sufficient facts to support her claim for punitive damages at this stage. The Complaint alleges that numerous issues of a similar nature occurred consistently over nearly two years while Decedent was a resident at the Defendant Facility, including reoccurring falls, blood sugar fluctuations and infections. Plaintiff’s allegations of corporate negligence are based on multiple theories that could support a finding that Defendants knew of, or were at least reckless regarding, the risks of harm to Decedent and yet took no (or insufficient) action to address those risks of harm. In particular, Plaintiff avers that the reoccurring issues were due to deliberate understaffing, a failure to train staff to ensure known problems did not reoccur, and a failure to rectify issues that inspections of the Defendant Facility had recently revealed. If Plaintiff proves the facts as alleged in the Complaint, a jury could conclude, for instance, that Decedent’s risk of falling was known and obvious, and that Defendants’ failure to prevent her from falling over a dozen times went beyond mere negligence and constituted at least a reckless failure to prevent further falls through improved staffing, policy, or training.
DAMAGES-PUNITIVE-NURSING HOME
December 15th, 2022 by Rieders Travis in Damages