GET HELP NOW - email us

    Good Samaritan Immunities

    Senate Bill No. 351, Session of 2011, Printer’s No. 2326, was recently enacted in the law.

    This legislation is another boutique immunity, intended to protect the health care providers who make serious mistakes that may kill or maim their patients. The law is terrible and represents another reason why preventable medical deaths in U.S. hospitals is at almost 200,000 per year. The Institute of Medicine, in 1999, set the number at just under 100,000. One of the leading causes of death in this country are preventable medical errors in hospitals, according to Dr. Gupta.

    The Good Samaritan Civil Immunity law pertains to use of AED devices, automated external defibrillator. The law says that any person, including an emergency response provider, even if that person is not trained to practice medicine, who “in good faith” renders emergency care or treatment will not be liable for any civil damages as a result of the care required except if the action is intentionally designed to cause harm or grossly negligent.

    Everyone acts in good faith when they give care. The insertion of the “good faith” language is meaningless.

    What is important is that the so-called Good Samaritan health care providers need no longer comply with an ordinary standard of care as judged by the conduct of others giving the same medical attention. In other words, those who act under the strictures of this law may be negligent and there is no compensation to the person who was hurt.

    Why carve out special exceptions for health care providers? In society everyone must comply with standards of reasonable care. A health care provider must give the same care, treatment and attention to a patient as a person would in like circumstances. That is called reasonable care. It makes sense and it works. It is the carrot and stick approach which has worked for hundreds of years under our common law system.

    If a person does not act with reasonable care, complying with standards of like treaters, why should they not compensate through their insurance coverage the people they have hurt? This sort of boutique immunity is detrimental to good health care, drives up the number of injured people, and ultimate results in higher insurance premiums for everyone. It is a bad law, it is bad policy, and it is bad for both patients and providers.

    Our Legal Team

    AttorneyClifford A. Rieders
    Jeffrey C. Dohrmann
    AttorneyJeffrey C. Dohrmann
    Corey J. Mowrey
    AttorneyCorey J. Mowrey
    Attorney John Humphrey
    AttorneyJohn M. Humphrey
    Attorney Walter
    AttorneyC. Scott Waters
    Pamela L. Shipman
    AttorneyPamela L. Shipman